Physician First Do No Harm; but if you do its OK to coerce patients

John Hopkins
Contributor
(866) 735-1102 Ext 710
Visit John Hopkins on FacebookVisit John Hopkins on LinkedInVisit John Hopkins on Twitter
Posted by John HopkinsSeptember 29, 2006 11:08 AM

The St. Petersburg Times reports a startling event. Physicians who, through less than candid means, convinced voters to limit the damages that victims of medical malpractice can collect; are now going to "convince" their patients to forgive them for their malpractice.

The Times reports that the waiver, which physicians will ask their patients to sign, will limit non-economic damages to $250,000. So, I guess the way it happens is that sick patients go in to see their "healer" and the doctor explains that he/she will be glad to "heal" them if they will simply sign this "little form". The sick patient does not want to sign the waiver; the healer apologizes for their inability to treat them without the agreement to limit the "healer's" liability to the sick patient in the event something goes wrong.

Physicians and the health care industry bemoaned that if the last round of tort reform was not passed by the public, they would all have to move out of Florida because malpractice insurance would not be affordable. Physicians' groups told the public that caps on damages were a good thing and they better pass them, if patients wanted to keep their doctors.

The insurance industry, though, stood before the legislature and testified that tort reform would have no effect on medical malpractice premiums and that Florida was not in the midst of a malpractice crisis. Study after study reveals the same thing: few malpractice cases are ever filed that lack merit and those that are filed against physicians are usually well deserved.

The fact is that the cost for a plaintiff's attorney to support the investigation and prosecution of a medical malpractice case is significant; sometimes into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. The average case takes years to get to trial and the plaintiff attorney is typically carrying all those costs for all those years. Since doctors statistically win in front of juries more often than plaintiffs; many attorneys end up "eating" all those costs in the event of a defense verdict.

The healthcare industry has done a dreadful and shameful job of policing itself. The medical boards are slow to ever discipline doctors and the "peter principle" is alive and well in the healthcare industry. Physicians have adopted the corporate health care mentality; where a patient is more a statistical profit margin than a "sick patient". Patients are treated to ten minutes and a cloud of dust from their physicians; rather than a caring, interested, healer.

Certainly, there are good doctors, just as there are good trial attorneys. I suspect patients will not see this waiver form thrust in front of them by good doctors.

And doctors whine about being sued; it has been the only thing keeping them in check...until now anyway.

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

TAPayne
Posted by TAPayne
October 18, 2006 4:31 PM

tort reform for medical malpractice?there is absolutely no need for such.what is needed is to stop the practice of credentialing people without the proper level of intellectual and academic capacity as medical professionals as social engineering projects ie Goals 2000 project.if a medical student needs the second two years of medical school (clinical studies)in order to raise a grade point average to "C" due to poor performance in the first two (academic studies)this person should NOT receive a medical degree. A "C" average may be sufficient for some professions, but not for any medical profession and absolutely not to receice an M.D.this simple correction in practices with show a huge drop in medical malpractice cases over time as the credentialed professionals are phased out by attrition

you also might consider that other forms of suits such as product liability and such would decrease if corporations were more interested in what their products will do once disseminated,rather than if they will make more off of the sales than they project they will pay in awards, so if you remove these awards or limit them it will be easier for these companies to figure this into their products and have even less consideration of the harm they do as even if the number of suits goes up they will still be able to maintain profitability, so look at who wants this reform and their hidden agendas

never answer an unanswered question with an unquestioned answer

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard West Palm Beach

InjuryBoard West Palm Beach RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board West Palm Beach is brought to you by Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA (866) 735-1102 Ext 700 www.searcylaw.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Nationwide practice, including West Palm Beach, Palm Beach, Belle Glade, Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Clewiston, Delray Beach, Fort Pierce, Greenacres, Hobe Sound, Jupiter, Lake Worth, Okeechobee, Palm City, Port Saint Lucie, Riviera Beach, Stuart
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address