How much stress can a Suzuki GSX-R1000 motorcycle frame take? (Part II)

Armand Rossetti
Armand Rossetti
Contributor
Posted by Armand RossettiFebruary 17, 2009 5:14 PM

According to Total Motorcycle Website, the entire 2006 Suzuki GSX-R1000 (gixer) motorcycle weighs only 365 lbs.; that's only twice the weight of the average gixer rider. When Suzuki introduced the GSX-R1000 in 2001 Suzuki engineers had increased the thickness of the frame by 0.5 mm (a dime at 1.40 mm is almost three times the added frame thickness). After adding to the GSX-R1000’s frame thickness, Suzuki reportedly gained a 10% increase in frame rigidity over the GSX-R750.

Suzuki then took about 31 pounds off the engine by replacing the GSX-R1300 high performance engine with a modified GSX-R750 engine. The new engine had a bigger bore, longer stroke, pistons with lower crowns, and a gear driven counter balancer, all weighing 130 lbs. The new GSX engine was about a third of the total weight of the motorcycle.

The replacement engine was capable of delivering a whopping 143 horse power to the motorcycle’s rear wheel with a capability of 80 ft lbs. of torque. Combining all that power with only 365 pounds of bike weight, a rider could reach a top speed of about 180 mph. Likewise from a standing stop, the GSX-R1000 was capable of running a quarter mile in 10.1 seconds and finishing at a speed of about 142 mph. If a rider tromped on the throttle and counted to three the GSX-R1000 would be storming down the road at 62 mph and readying itself to be at 100 mph a few seconds later.

Suzuki seemed to have created a really light and rigid 180 mph thoroughbred racing bike for streets that weren't safe to ride on at 90 mph. For example, Suzuki trimmed four pounds off the exhaust system by using Titanium, a lighter, tougher and stronger metal, and it manufactured the front fork using low weight Titanium. With these engineering changes, Suzuki topped the performance of the closest competitor in the GSX's class, the Yamaha YZF-R1.

To keep the GSX-R1000 feather weight and speedy, Suzuki had to choose light weight metals for different parts of the bike. However, it seems curious that Suzuki did not use a Titanium alloy instead of Aluminum to make the GSX frame, especially when higher tensile strength would be necessary to counterbalance obvious frame stress factors.

Tensile strength is the stress at which a material (like Aluminum or Titanium) breaks or permanently deforms. There are three definitions of tensile strength:

Yield strength, which is stress at which material strain changes from elastic deformation to plastic deformation, causing it to deform permanently;

Ultimate strength , which is the maximum stress a material can withstand when subjected to tension, compression or shearing. It is the maximum stress on the stress-strain curve; and

Breaking strength, which is the stress coordinate on the stress-strain curve at the point of rupture.

For example, a certain Titanium alloy (Titanium + 6% Aluminum, 4% Vanadium) has yield strength of 800 MPa, while Aluminum has yield strength of less than half that number (400 MPa). The 6%Al, 4%V Titanium alloy has a much higher ultimate strength of 900 MPa versus 455 MPa for Aluminum. Why Suzuki chose Aluminum over Titanium alloy for manufacturing the frame while choosing Titanium alloy to manufacture the exhaust system baffles the mind.

To better understand why Aluminum might not have been the best choice for the GSX frame, we turn to the Suzuki Service Bulletin entitled Voluntary Safety Recall Campaign #2A08 2005 and 2006 GSX-R1000 Motorcycles Frame Reinforcement Brace Installation/Frame Replacement. That publication illustrates where the Aluminum K5 and K6 GSX-R1000 frames have been fracturing. The Service Bulletin also outlines reimbursement, and dealership/manufacturer responsibilities. The Bulletin also reveals VIN ranges for recalled GSX-R1000 motorcycles, the parts needed, and it establishes which motorcycles will not qualify for bracing. And it continues by providing frame inspection and reinforcement installation directions.

Suzuki's publication contais lots of graphics and pictures that reveal fractures on the underside of the frame and to the right and left of the steering neck. Accordingly, Suzuki has supplied a brace for the frame that is designed to span between and hold the two fracture sites together. And a mechanic has to either remove or detach several components from the frame, inspect the frame for cracks using a special, manufacturer supplied dye kit, and then use an epoxy adhesive to cement the brace to the frame before re-bolting the components.

In addition, some of the hardware had to be changed, and depending on temperature and conditions, the epoxy that glues the bracket to the frame has to cure anywhere from one to 24 hours before the dealership can return the GSX-R1000 to its owner. The dealership then has to submit a claim for each frame repair (labor taking three hours) or frame replacement (labor taking 11 hours). The dealership then has 10 days to return replaced frames for credit.

Suzuki service centers also received a copy of its January 21, 2009 recall letter, which outlines the reasons for the recall, and explains reimbursement. Lastly, the Service Bulletin contains a request worksheet and Fax form.

After reading all of the above information, it seems reasonable that Suzuki should have engineered the frame to better withstand ordinary forces that occur during daily use. Once again, those ordinary forces might include a 160 lb (average) rider sitting over a 130 lb. engine, and other accoutrements, all located smack dab in the middle of the GSX-R1000’s 55.3 inch wheelbase.

It is also interesting to note that the GSX-R1000 comes equipped with a front suspension that has a fully adjustable piggy-back shock absorber having a linear rate linkage system. The adjustable shock is attached to that rigid, lightweight Aluminum frame, having a combination cast and extruded spar construction for "precisely calculated rigidity."

Lets recapitulate. The GSX-R1000 is light, it's lightening fast, and the rider can adjust its front suspension to make the bike even stiffer while going over bumps in the road. Everything that has any weight; the engine, exhaust and rider...are sitting in the middle of the motorcycle, supplying a massive vector force downward. That downward force multiplies: as the GSX-R1000 takes ordinary bumps in the pavement; as its engine brings the bike to warp speed; and as the bike banks, turns and brakes while riding on uneven pavement. With all of this in mind, the centerpiece that is managing and supporting all of this "normal" activity is a thin, lightweight Aluminum frame. And to make that frame stronger and more rigid, Suzuki has tacked on what amounts to a third of the thickness of a dime's more worth of the metal.

For some reason, however, using high tensile strength Titanium to manufacture the frame was not in the cards, back then, as a Suzuki design option.

Lastly, on September 22, 2006, Suzuki updated the GSX-R1000 for 2007. The new GSX gained 14 lbs. over the 2006 model, and the engine and chassis were updated (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_GSX-R1000).

3 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

amafan
Posted by amafan
February 18, 2009 7:50 PM

I don't know what you are trying to accomplish with these blogs, but what you are accomplishing is showing your ignorance of the subject. The cost of a titanium frame versus an aluminum frame would price the motorcycle right out of the market place. Suzuki is not negligent by not equipping the GSX-R1000 with an aluminum frame. There is no streetbike currently available with a titanium alloy frame. In fact, MotoGP racebikes, which are thoroughbred prototypes built to exceed a legitimate 210 mph and withstand forces much greater than any streetbike ever made, have frames made out of aluminum alloy, not titanium. In fact, the 2008 MotoGP World Championship motorcycle, the Ducati Desmosedici GP8 has a trellis frame that is essentially a birdcage of mild steel tubes. In 2009 it will be replaced with a frame made out of carbon-fiber, not titanium.

Armand Rossetti
Posted by Armand Rossetti
February 19, 2009 8:42 AM

Posted by amafan
Wednesday, February 18, 2009 7:50 PM EST


"I don't know what you are trying to accomplish with these blogs, but what you are accomplishing is showing your ignorance of the subject....not Titanium."

Thank you for your comment, amafan. I have a few points for you to consider:

Titanium prices have leapt to the highest level for 20 years, around USD27 per kilo for aerospace-grade material, at a time when demand is stretching supply.

More ...

Taking that increase into consideration, pure Titanium costs about $12.00 a pound.

$27.00/2.2lbs/kilo = $12.27/lb

How much does a frame weigh and does a suitable alloy using Titanium cost less?

How much is a life worth?

How many more dollars would the GSX-R1000 cost as a result of using Titanium?

How much did the K6’s muffler and inner baffle cost; those were made with Titanium, and the muffler is much less important than the frame?

Please notice the muffler on the K6 in the beginning of this video:





Despite the above production, Suzuki has the gall to blame GSX-R1000 owners for inducing frame fatigue.

As far as safety is concerned, the frame is the most important part of the GSX-R1000. As far as I am concerned, Suzuki was well aware of the type of daily punishment its GSX-R1000 (K5-K6) would be receiving; during “ordinary” use, racing activities, and as a result of riders pulling “stunts” (just like the one in the Suzuki video).

A bike with the specifications that a GSX-R1000 has, and the potential for riders to take those specs to the limit on or off the racing track…demands very close attention to frame design and manufacture.

It seems as if Suzuki did not pay enough attention to engineering the frames for the K5 and K6 models; whether for "ordinary use" or otherwise.

Teabreak
Posted by Teabreak
March 25, 2009 10:37 AM

Some good info here, good innitiative! But it's not all about the alloy frame only. There is a real danger in these insufficient Suzuki weldings which obviously cant be done with the energy needed to make both materials fluid. Suzuki's weldings are absolutely insufficient more glued than welded due to the fact that the material is so thin it would culr up like a pig tail if they would use the energy needed to do a good job.

The bracket they put on is, in my opinion, more done out of juridical thoughts than trying to find a sufficient technical solution.

In most cases it wouldnt do any harm for a road bike if it would be 20, 30 pounds heavier and for that a lot safer! No need to use Titanium, a decent CroMo frame would do the job. After all, the few pounds safed are only 10th of seconds on the track. They can keep doing it there but roadbikes should firstly be safe as they are way too fast for public road circumstances anyways.
Having been a bike tester for many years, I was shocked when I saw their 'solution' put on my frame!
In their lihgtweight madness, that only serves race purposes, they have definetely gone too far.
I am sure Suzuki knew about this when they put the bike on the market, if not, they knew shortly after the first accidents happened. Having the nerves to wait almost 4 years before doing 'something', makes me feel sick.
The K5 K6 is a wonderful bike, but it's, in my opinion, a potential deathtrapp.
I am now forced to spent thousands on either a new bike or make my bike safe.
If the customers react like they do now and neglect the problem, Suzuki will get away with it. And that's exactly what they have in mind.
I sincerely hope that the lawyers in USA and UK will succeed in their lawsues that will come up soon!

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard West Palm Beach

InjuryBoard West Palm Beach RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board West Palm Beach is brought to you by Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, PA (866) 735-1102 Ext 700 www.searcylaw.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Nationwide practice, including West Palm Beach, Palm Beach, Belle Glade, Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Clewiston, Delray Beach, Fort Pierce, Greenacres, Hobe Sound, Jupiter, Lake Worth, Okeechobee, Palm City, Port Saint Lucie, Riviera Beach, Stuart
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address